
💰 Only 19 examples of this shocking mint mistake exist—and each one can sell for up to $150,000! Could this ultra-rare mule error be sitting unnoticed in your change? Let’s break down everything you need to know.
🔥 What Makes the Sacagawea Mule So Valuable?
This coin is the ultimate U.S. Mint blunder:
- Obverse (front): Sacagawea dollar portrait dated 2000-P
- Reverse (back): State quarter eagle design (instead of the correct dollar reverse)
- Error type: A mule coin (two mismatched dies struck together)
- Confirmed population: Only 19 authentic pieces known today
Because of its extreme rarity and historic significance, collectors pay six figures for genuine examples.
💎 Key Identification Checklist
Think you may have one? Here’s how to confirm:
✅ Date: Must be 2000 with a “P” mint mark
✅ Reverse: Quarter eagle design (not the dollar reverse)
✅ Edge: Smooth/plain (normal quarters have reeding; dollars should have edge lettering)
✅ Weight: 5.67 grams (lighter than the standard Sacagawea dollar)
⚡ How Much Is It Worth? (2024 Values)
- Circulated: $50,000 – $75,000
- Mint State MS-63+: $100,000 – $125,000
- Superb Gem MS-66: $150,000+
Even a well-worn example can be life-changing money!
❌ Common Look-Alikes (Worth $1 or Less)
- Regular Sacagawea dollars
- Standard quarter-dollars
- Altered or damaged coins (which destroy collector value)
🛑 What To Do If You Think You Found One
- Handle carefully – only by the edges, with cotton gloves
- Photograph clearly – both sides and the smooth edge
- Submit to PCGS or NGC for authentication
- Insure for at least $100K before mailing or transporting
⚠️ Warning: Most “finds” are fakes. Only professional grading can confirm authenticity.
Why This Error Is Legendary
✔️ Fewer than 20 known—rarer than many classic key dates
✔️ A true modern treasure that commands six-figure prices
✔️ Still possible to discover in old rolls, bags, or collections
👉 Check your 2000-P dollars carefully—because the Sacagawea Mule isn’t just rare… it’s one of the most valuable modern U.S. coins ever struck.
Leave a Reply